|
|
|
|
Home
| About | How
to Search | Cases | History
| Names |
Places | Glossary
| Subject Index |
Sources | Links
| Law School
|
|
Abraham Standifer v. Thomas Dowlin
Record
|
Standifer Filed 5th July 1832 Costs Taxed Page 162 Territory of Arkansas Pleas had at a term of the Circuit Court of Washington County at the courthouse in the town of Fayetteville on the Twelfth day of December it being the second Monday after the fourth Monday in the year of our Lord One thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty One, and the fifty sixth year of the Independence of the United States of America Before the Honorable Thomas P. Eskridge Judge. Thomas Dowlin use of John McPhaill Be it remembered that heretofore on the 6th day of November Eighteen
hundred and thirty one was filed in the Clerks office in the county aforesaid
the following declaration to wit. Thomas Dowlin who sues for the use of John McPhaill by his attorney complains of Abraham Standifer surviving partner of the late firm of A & S Standifer defendant in custody &c of a plea that he render unto him the sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and six cents which to him he owes and from him he unjustly detains For that whereas heretofore to wit at a Circuit Court of Madison in the state of Alabama began and held at the courthouse in the town of Huntsville in said county [Image of page 3] on the first Monday after the fourth Monday in October being the thirteenth of said month in the year of our Lord One thousand eight hundred and twenty six and in the fifty first year of the American Independence before the Honorable John M. Taylor the sitting Judge of said court. This plaintiff on the 7th day of November being a day of the term of said Circuit Court to wit, in the county of Washington Territory of Arkansas it being a court of competent jurisdiction by consideration and judgments of said court Recovered against the said defendant the sum of ninety eight dollars and fifty cents debt and also the further sum of fifty eight dollars and forty four cents damages sustained by means of the detention of this said debt besides the cost by him in that behalf expended And afterwards to wit 8th day of December 1826 Lemuel Mead Clerk of the said Circuit Court of Madison county state of Alabama to wit in the county of Washington aforesaid issued a Writ of fieri facias against said debt on said judgment with this indorsement on said Writ of Fieri facias. Judgment 7th of November 1826, Clerks fees $4.62, Tax $2.00, Sheriff $1.50, Attorney $4.00 Received this 14th December 1826. John P. Neal Sheriff, returned, no property found in my county to satisfy this execution 26th of April 1827. John P. Neal Sheriff by his deputy Phillip Busford by this record and process thereof in the said court at Huntsville in the county of Madison and state of Alabama to wit in the county of Washington af.d manifestly appears which record is hereunto this court shown this date is the day and year aforesaid which judgments still remains in said court in its full force [Image of page 4] and upon the said Declaration the following writ issued. Territory of Arkansas And in the said writ and declaration the following indorsements were made. came to hand 7th Nov 1831. Larkin Newton, Dept. Sheffs. Served the within declaration on the within named Abraham Standifer in
Prairie Township on the 11th day of November 1831, by leaving a copy of
the same at his place of residence with a person over the age of fifteen
years and informing said person the contents thereof. Served the within writ on the within named Abraham Standifer in Prairie
Township on the 11th November 1831 by leaving a copy of the same at his
place of residence with a person over the age of fifteen years and informing
said person the contents thereof. And on the fifth day of our said December term the following demurrer
was filed to wit: And the said Abraham Standifer comes and defends the wrongs and injury
when &c and says that the said plaintiff his action aforesaid Thereof
against him ought not to have or maintain because he says that the said
plaintiff declarations and the matters, and things therein contained in
manner and form as the same are therein set forth are not sufficient in
law for the said plaintiffs to have or maintain his said action thereof
against him nor is he bound by the law of the land in any manner to answer
the same and this he is ready to verify. wherefore for want of a sufficient
declaration in this behalf the said defendant prays Judgment of the said
plaintiff shall hear on motion his said action thereof against him. &C. December Term 1831 Thomas Dowlin for the use of John McPhaill And now on this day came the parties by their attorneys. and all and
singular the law arising upon the demurrer joined in this case being seen
and by the court here fully understood. It is considered by the Court
that the said demurrer be sustained and it is therefore considered by
the court that the said defendant have and recover of the said plaintiff
his costs in and about this demurrer expended. And on the motion of the
plaintiff leave is granted him to amend his declaration in the course
of ten days and this cause continued until the next term of this court. Thomas Dowlin who sues for the use and benefit of John McPhail by his
attorney complains of Abraham Standifer, surviving partner of the late
firm A. and S. Standifer in custody &c of a plea that he render unto
him the sum of One hundred and sixty nine dollars and six cents which
to him he owes and from him he unjustly detains For that whereas heretofore
to wit at a circuit court of Madison County in the state of Alabama began
and held at the courthouse in the town of Huntsville in said county on
the first Monday after the fourth Monday in October begun this thirteenth
of said month in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty
six and in the fifty first [Image of page 7]
year of the American Independence before the Honourable John M. Taylor
then sitting judge of said court, it being a court of competent jurisdiction.
The plaintiff on the 7th day of November being a day of the term of said
in consideration and judgment of said court recovered against the said
defendant the sum of ninety eight dollars and fifty cents debt and also
the further sum of fifty eight dollars and forty cents damages sustained
by reason of the detention of said debt also the further sum of twelve
dollars and twelve cents for his costs and charges by him about his suit
in that behalf expended the said several sums of debt, damages and costs
amounting in the whole to the sum of One hundred sixty nine dollars and
six cents. The sum first above demanded and afterwards to wit on the 8th
day of December 1826. Lemuel Mead Clerk of said Circuit Court of Madison
county state of Alabama issued a Writ of fieri facias on the said judgment
for debt, damages and costs aforesaid which said Execution of fieri facias
was received by John P. Neal sheriff of the said county of Madison and
state of Alabama on the 14th of December 1826 and returned no property
found in my county to satisfy this execution the 26th of April 1827. John
P. Neal sheriff by his deputy Phillip Busford by the record, process and
proceedings of said court manifestly appears to wit in the county of Washington
and Territory aforesaid, which record is hereto the court shewn, the date
is the day and year aforesaid, which judgment still remains in said court
to wit in Madison County State of Alabama, in its full force and affect
not in any wise reversed, annuled, set aside, paid off, satisfied or discharged
whereby an action hath accrued to the said plaintiff to demand and have
of and from the said defendant [Image of page 8]
the said sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and six cents above
demanded, yet the said defendants although often requested to do so hath
not as yet paid the said sum of one hundred and sixty nine dollars and
six cents above demanded or any part thereof to the said plaintiff. But
he to do this hath hitherto wholly refused and still doth refuse to the
damage of said plaintiff two hundred dollars and therefore he brings his
suit. And afterwards to wit at Circuit Court began and held in the town of
Fayetteville on the 11th day of June 1832 on the Thomas Dowlin for the use of John McPhail And the said defendant comes and defends this wrong and injury when &c
And says that there is not any Record of the said supposed recovery in
the said declaration mentioned and remaining in the said Circuit Court
of Madison County in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above
in his said declaration alledged and this he the said defendant is ready
to verify wherefore he prays Judgment if the said plaintiff ought to have
or maintain his aforesaid action thereof against him &c Thomas Dowlin for the use of John McPhail And the said Thomas Dowlin use of &c as to the said plea of the said
defendant by him above pleaded sayeth that he the said plaintiff by reason
of anything by the said defendant in said plea alledged ought not to be
Bared or precluded from having and maintaining his aforesaid action thereof
and against him the said defendant because he saith that there is such
a record of the said recovery remaining in said Circuit Court of Madison
County as he the said plaintiff hath above in his said declaration in
that behalf alledged and this he the said plaintiff is ready to verify
by the said record when where and in such manner as the said court shall
direct and award and he prays that the said record may be filed And seen
by the said court here and because the said court are not yet advised
what judgment to give of and upon the premises a day is therefore given
to the parties aforesaid before our said Washington Circuit Court entitled
to hear this judgment of said court Therefore for thus the said court
of said county now here is not yet advised thereof. And there upon the defendant filed the following affidavit to wit, Thomas Dowlin for the use of John McPhaill The above named defendant having sworn testifies and states that he is
informed and believe [Image of page 10] that
the above suit has been instituted against him by John McPhaill and the
council for said plaintiff without any lawful authority from said plaintiff
and that he has good reasons to apprehend that if the debt in this declaration
should be paid to the said McPhaill or to said attorney or council that
the said McPhaill or said attorney could not execute any legal acquittance
for the same. This defendant therefore moves the court to make said McPhaill
Test. B. H. Smithson clk And afterward on the day and year aforesaid the following order was made Thos Dowlin for use of John McPhaill And now on this day came the parties by their attorneys. And the said defendant filed his plea to which the plaintiff filed his replication and issue is joined thereon in short on the record by consent of parties and thereupon the defendant filed his affidavit and moved the court for a rule upon the said John McPhaill and the council for said plaintiff to file their warrants of attorney or show by what authority they prosecute this suit. and the court not being sufficiently advised took time to consider thereof. Thomas Dowlin for the use of John McPhaill And now on this day came the parties by their attornies and the court
being sufficiently advised of and concerning the motion submitted on yesterday. Abraham Standifer Be it remembered that previous to the trial of the above case to wit
on the 13th day of June in the year of 1832 [Image
of page 12] at the June term of the Circuit Court of Washington County
the said defendant filed his affidavit here filed marked A and here made
a part of this Bill of Exceptions and thereupon moved this court for a
Rule upon the said John McPhaill and the council for said plaintiff to
file their warrant of attorney or to show by what authority they prosecute
this suit which motion was on this day overruled by the courts Know all men by these presents that we A Standifer, S G Sneed and R W
Reynolds are held and firmly bound unto Thomas Dowlin for the use of John
McPhaill in the sum of five hundred and fifty three dollars the payment
of which will and truly to be made now bind ourselves our heirs executors
and administrators jointly and severally witness our hands and seals this
15th day of June 1832. A Standifer (seal) Clerks fees $5.70 Sheriff $1.20 Territory of Arkansas I, B. H. Smithson clerk of this Washington Circuit Court do hereby certify
that the above and foregoing contains a true and correct transcript of
the records & proceedings had in my office in the case of Thomas Dowlin
for the use of John McPhaill plaintiff against Abraham Standifer surviving
partner of the late firm of A & S Standifer defendant. (Seal) |
Home
| About | How
to Search | Cases | History
| Names | Places
| Glossary
Subject Index | Sources
| Links | Law
School